Lost Opportunities

Image_and_illumination_front_20211020

By Stephen W. Hiemstra

The hallmark of a de-centered life is the lost opportunity. When one takes one’s eye off of the image of God, it’s like taking your eye off the ball in a basketball game—the momentary opportunity to score is lost and it cannot be recovered. Timing is everything in life. Likewise, the mark of a de-centered culture is the accumulation of lost opportunities.

Understanding Urban Society

Three characteristics of urban society unsettle most of us: layering, downward mobility, and outmigration.

Layering is the idea that cities grow at the edges, from center out, yielding a picture like rings on an archery target. For the first twenty years, each layer is multigenerational with young families. After twenty years, the younger generation moves out leaving empty nesters. After forty years, that layer begins to die off, leaving seniors and urban blight. Churches tend to thrive during the first twenty years, stabilize in the second, and decline in the third.

Downward mobility is a description of the problem facing the younger generation in the midst of layering. The best educated and most ambitious kids in each generation can afford to live anywhere, including layers that their parents inhabit—the upwardly mobile. In previous generations, upward mobility characterized most kids, but since about 1980 the majority of kids (about eighty percent) can be described as downwardly mobile. Downward mobility implies that one cannot afford to live in neighborhood where their parents live and must move elsewhere just to get by as the standard of living falls.

Outmigration can occur in two ways. The first pattern of outmigration is the product of downward mobility where affluent families loose day-to-day touch with their kids because they cannot afford to live nearby. The second pattern of outmigration occurs when layers suffering urban blight lose their upwardly mobile kids and only retain their downwardly mobile kids. The same mechanism affects areas of rural blight. In both the urban and rural blight scenarios, the economic base of the community has collapsed and outmigration has left the community stripped of its most talented kids creating a poverty ghetto. 

Poverty and Ethnicity

Poverty ghettos are often ethnically uniform, but outmigration, not ethnic discrimination, is the primary cause of their poverty. Prior to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other Great Society programs, discrimination created ethnic ghettos that appeared as self-contained, autonomous communities where ethnic businesses thrived. Talented and less talented youth both remained in the community and drove its cultural and economic development. 

The move to integrate society has facilitated the outmigration of talented youth from all communities to affluent, multi-ethnic communities where job opportunities prosper their growth. Because of outmigration, society today is a tale of two cities. Ethnically uniform, poverty ghettos have formed as the flip side of the ethnically diverse, affluent ghettos. Attributing this dichotomy to discrimination may be politically expedient, but it mischaracterizes the cause and effect of outmigration.

Economic Pressure

Downward mobility pressures most kids coming of age today. When standards of living fall, most people delay marriage and have fewer kids. My parents married (1952) when my dad was twenty-one. I married (1984) when I was thirty, long after most of my peers. My dad and I both earned doctorates in economics. Today, thirty-something is a typical age for marriage.

In 2017, fertility rates for blacks (1.8 %) and whites (1.7 %) have fallen under the two-point-one percent required to reproduce the population in the United States. For Hispanics (2.0%), fertility rates are higher, but even Hispanics are having fewer children (Mathews and others 2019).

The average life-expectancy in the United States recently fell for three years in a row before stabilizing (e.g. Case and Deaton 2020, 194). The increase in deaths before COVID was due primarily to drug overdoses and suicide (e.g. Tavernise). The theme in rising death rates has been increases in preventable deaths. It is unclear at this point how many of the over nine hundred thousand COVID death since 2020 could be classified as preventable, but clearly many since 2021 were preventable through vaccination and wearing masks.

Layering, downward mobility, and outmigration conspire to pressure standards of living and to stratify the population both by age group, and by economic class. No one expects a lot of old people in college towns or urban areas outside the areas of blight; no one expects a lot of young people retirement destinations or in rural blight areas.

Cultural De-centering

External pressure is painful, but among centered individuals it is not necessarily fatal. In the Parable of the Prodigal Son, the younger brother strays, wastes his inheritance, and becomes destitute, but he learns from his experience (a hint of centering) and returns to his father (Luke 15). What would have happened to him had he not returned to his father?

What if the Prodigal Son blamed his father for his predicament declaring himself to be a victim and his father a villain and refused to see him any further? Victim, villain, and helpless stories are generally counter-productive because they preclude taking responsibility for solving the problem (PGMS 2012, 116-119), but today we hear them all the time.

What if the Prodigal Son took offense at something his father had said? There is actually a word for this fragile-ego syndrome: Micro-aggression. A micro-aggression is subtle, indirect, or unintentional slight, like not paying enough attention to all members of a group. When it is hard to hear information inconsistent with someone’s self-image or preconceptions of an issue, dialogue dies.

What if the Prodigal Son refused to recognize his father’s authority? One prominent social critique, citing Feud, blames repression (that is, sexual frustration) and social domination specifically on the father’s role in the family (Mancuse 1974, 15).

The point of these what if scenarios is to highlight powerful forces in our society that frustrate centering our lives on God and work to de-center both our faith and relationships.

Importance of Centering

Our secular society generally dismisses the value of religious instruction, even when it comes to teaching simple patience. Four-year olds, given a choice between having one marshmallow now or two later, who choose to wait for two are much more likely to graduate from college than their peers, a stunning result (Mischel 2014, 4-5). In today’s economy in the United States, where downward mobility has replaced upward mobility for about eighty percent of the population, offering godly guidance on personal discipline is a practical concern.

References

Case, Anne and Angus Deaton. 2020. Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Marcuse, Herbert. 1974. Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud (Orig Pub 1955). Boston: Beacon Press.

Mathews, T.J. M.S., and Brady E. Hamilton. 2019. Total Fertility Rates by State and Race and Hispanic Origin: United States, 2017. National Vital

Statistics Reports, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Vol. 68, No. 1. January 10. Online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_01-508.pdf, Accessed: 14 February 2022.

Mischel, Walter. 2014. The Marshmallow Test: Mastering Self-Control. New York: Little, Brown and Company.

Patterson, Kerry Joseph Grenny, Ron McMillan, and Al Switzler (PGMS). 2012. Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tavernise, Sabrina. 2016. “U.S. Suicide Rate Surges to a 30-Year High.” New York Times. April 22. Online: https://nyti.ms/2k9vzFZ, Accessed: 13 March 2017.

Lost Opportunities

Also see:

The Who Question

Preface to a Life in Tension

Other ways to engage online:

Author site: http://www.StephenWHiemstra.net

Publisher site: http://www.T2Pneuma.com

Newsletter: https://bit.ly/East_2022, Signup

 

Continue Reading

Guelich Exegetes the Sermon on the Mount, Part 1

Robert Guelich The Sermon on the Mount

Robert A. Guelich. 1982. The Sermon on the Mount:  A Foundation for Understanding.  Dallas:  Word Publishing. (Go to part 2)

Review by Stephen W. Hiemstra

The Sermon on the Mount is a surprisingly oblique, but self-contained, section in Matthew’s Gospel spanning from chapter 5 through verse 8:1. In the sermon, Jesus presents a kind of ordination service for the Apostles with crowds in the background looking on. What does he tell them?  What are his priorities? How are we to interpret what is said?

Introduction

In his commentary, The Sermon on the Mount, Robert  Guelich starts by recognizing the enormity of the task, but lays out his reason for writing with these words:

Yet the absence of an extensive, critical, exegetical commentary in nearly four decades of biblical studies despite the vast literature on the Sermon provides both an opportunity and a need in New Testament (NT) studies (11).

Because NT scholarship is written both in German and English, Guelich’s studies in the U.S., Scotland, and Germany—his doctorate is from the University of Hamburg—suggests he has good preparation to write such a commentary[1].  At the time he wrote, Guelich was a professor of NT at Fuller Theological Seminary.

Literature Review

Guelich’s literature review (14-22) is relatively brief but includes some interesting points.  Citing Kissenger, Guelich notes that in early church (Ante-Nicene) writings chapters 5-7 of Matthew are cited more frequently than any other 3 chapters in the Bible (14).  Augustine was likely the first to use the term, Sermon on the Mount (15).  In his book, Summa, Thomas Aquinas distinguishes between “counsels” and “commandments” (advice versus obligation) placing Jesus’ teaching in the Sermon under “counsels” (15).  Luther preached a series of sermons on the Sermon focused on “polemics against the papists” (16) while Calvin’s primary interest was on Jesus’ interpretation of law (17).  Guelich describes Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Cost of Discipleship as one of the better known treatments of the Sermon which, of course, focused on what disciples should do rather than on theological interpretation [2].

Organization

Guelich’s commentary is written in 10 chapters, including:

  1. Introduction (pages 13-40);
  2. The Setting of the Sermon on the Mount (Matt 4:23-5:2; 41-60);
  3. The Gospel of the Kingdom (Matt 5:3-12; 62-112);
  4. The Role of Discipleships (Matt 5:13-16; 119-131);
  5. Jesus and the Law (Matt 5:17-20; 134-170);
  6. The Greater Righteousness (Matt 5:21-48; 175-265);
  7. On Doing Righteousness (Matt 6:1-18; 272-316);
  8. The Life of Prayer (Matt 6:19-7:12; 321-379);
  9. The Narrow Gate (Matt 7:13-27; 382-411); and
  10. Epilogue (Matt 7:28-29; 414-419).

These chapters are preceded by a brief preface and followed by a bibliography and indices of authors and scriptural passages.  The Beatitudes, which appear in Matthew 5:3-11, are treated primarily in chapter 3.

Let me turn briefly to the questions mentioned above.

What does Jesus tell them?

Guelich (36-39) breaks the sermon into 3 parts:  the Beatitudes, admonitions, and warnings. He sees the Beatitudes serving as a theological introduction expanded on in the admonitions and warnings of Matthew 5:17-7:27. Guelich sees the admonitions ending with the Golden rule in Matthew 7:12.  The warnings then follow in 7:13-27.  Ironically, the Lord’s Prayer appears among the admonitions in Matthew 6 and he sees the prayer providing structure to the remainder of the chapter and the first 12 verses of Matthew 7.

What are Jesus’ priorities?

Jesus is addressing the Apostles to inaugurate his vision for discipleship in the new age of the Kingdom of Heaven, summarized especially in Isaiah 61 (37):

“…the LORD has anointed me to bring good news to the poor; he has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to those who are bound; to proclaim the year of the LORD’s favor, and the day of vengeance of our God; to comfort all who mourn; to grant to those who mourn in Zion…” (Isa 61:1-3 ESV)

These priorities are captured in the Beatitudes.  They are credible, in part, because they appear almost verbatim in Luke 4:17-20 where Jesus gives his “call” sermon.

How are we to interpret what Jesus said?

Guelich describes his interpretation method as “critical, historical” commentary. He writes:

“…this commentary offers a critical exegesis in that it makes use of the literary and historical critical tools include text, source, form, tradition, redaction, and structural criticism”. (23)

Guelich’s skill as an interpreter is reflected in the wide range of critical methods that he employs.  For example, he carefully distinguishes 3 sources in Matthew’s Gospel: Q materials appearing in Matthew and Luke; Matthew’s redaction (things attributable only to Matthew); and other NT sources, such as Mark.  This careful inventory of sources provides Guelich the ability to infer author intent and other things when discussing particular Gospel writers.  He sees the end of the Sermon (Matt 7:28) being borrowed from Mark 1:22 and the prelude to the Sermon (Matt 4:23-5:2) appearing at Mark 1:39 (414-415).  This insight places the Sermon early in Jesus’ ministry.

Assessment

Robert Guelich’s commentary, The Sermon on the Mount, is one of the most carefully written and interesting commentaries that I have ever read.  In part 2, I will focus in more depth on particular issues that he raises.

Footnotes

[1] Guelich’s BS is from Wheaton College, his MS from the University of Illinois, and S.T.B. is from Fuller Theological Seminary.  He has done post-graduate studies at University of Aberdeen (UK) and the University of Tübingen.

[2] See my review of the Cost of Discipleship at:   Bonhoeffer’s Nachfolge:  Following After Christ (http://wp.me/p3Xeut-y9).

Guelich Exegetes the Sermon on the Mount, Part 1

Also see:

Books, Films, and Ministry

Other ways to engage online:

Author site: http://www.StephenWHiemstra.net

Publisher site: http://www.T2Pneuma.com

 

Continue Reading

Sin and Evil: Monday Monologues (podcast), May 9, 2022

Stephen_HIemstra_20210809

 By Stephen W. Hiemstra

This morning I will share a prayer and reflect on the Sin and Evil. After listening, please click here to take a brief listener survey (10 questions).

To listen, click on this link.

Hear the words; Walk the steps; Experience the joy!

Sin and Evil: Monday Monologues (podcast), May 9, 2022

Also see:

Monday Monologue On March 26, 2018 

Other ways to engage online:

Author site: http://www.StephenWHiemstra.net,

Publisher site: http://www.T2Pneuma.com.

Continue Reading

Prayer Contra Sin

Image_and_illumination_front_20211020

By Stephen W. Hiemstra

Almighty Father,

All praise and honor, power and dominion, legislator of righteousness and judge of the sinful, for you created us in your image and have guided us to glorify that image in our lives and work.

Forgive us when we avert our eyes from evil and let besetting sins creep into our identities.

Thank you for the guidance of the law and your character, especially the example of Jesus Christ.

In the power of your Holy Spirit, draw us to yourself: open our hearts, illumine our minds, and strengthen our hands in your service.

In Jesus’ precious name, Amen.

Prayer Contra Sin

Also see:

The Who Question

Preface to a Life in Tension

Other ways to engage online:

Author site: http://www.StephenWHiemstra.net

Publisher site: http://www.T2Pneuma.com

Newsletter: https://bit.ly/East_2022, Signup

 

Continue Reading

SIn and Evil

Image_and_illumination_front_20211020

And lead us not into temptation, 

but deliver us from evil.

(Matt 6:13)

By Stephen W. Hiemstra

The Apostle Paul writes: ”All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” (Rom 3:23) Augustine (Foley 2006, 9) argued that we are born in sin. The early church routinely practiced exorcism as part of the baptismal service because: “The exorcisms [meant] to face evil, to acknowledge its reality, to know its power, and to proclaim the power of God to destroy it.” (Schmemann 1973, 70-71)

Sin Defined

Sin is a broad term encompassing several related ideas: sin, trespass, and iniquity.

In New Testament Greek, sin is an archery term that means to fall short of the mark. When we strive to do good, but give into temptation, we sin.

Trespass is a legal term that implies the breaking of a rule or law. Driving at ninety miles per hour on a road with a posted speed limit of fifty-five miles per hour is a trespass.

Iniquity, like sin, can also take a broad meaning but it is helpful to think of iniquity as failing to do something good. The most famous case of the bystander problem occurred in New York City (Queens) in 1964 when thirty-eight people witnessed the stabbing death of Kitty Genovese and no one came to her aid or even bothered to call the police (White 2004, 155). Watching someone get murdered may not be illegal, but it is an iniquity.

The Importance of Purpose

James K. A. Smith offers an interesting ethical insight into the nature of evil. An instrument (or person) is good when it is used with its purpose in view and evil when it is not.

Smith asks how one would evaluate a flute used to roast marshmallows over a fire— we flinch this image of a misused flute. Why? The measure of a flute is how it is used to play music, not how well it roasts marshmallows. Smith (2016, 89) observes: “Virtue is bound up with a sense of excellence: a virtue is a disposition that inclines us to achieve the good for which we are made.” Being created in the image of God implies that we are on a mission in worship to develop the virtues through ritual and sacrament that match God’s intent for our lives (Smith 2016, 88).

Rick Warren (2002, 17) put it this way: “You were born by his purpose and for his purpose.” (Col 1:16) 

Pejorative Evil

Evil is often defined today as the absence of good. When God created light, he declared it to be good (Gen 1:3). The absence of light, darkness, could be thought of as evil—the absence of good without a pejorative inference. True evil is, however, never simply the absence of good.

Viktor Frankl (2008, 92) was a Jewish psychiatrist interned in the concentration camps by the Germans during the Second World War. His tips to prospective camp inmates on how to survive the camps offer insight into the nature of pejorative evil:

  • Don’t draw attention to yourself from sadistic guards.
  • Shave daily, walk briskly, and stand up straight to look healthy enough for work.
  • Applaud profusely when sadistic guards read poetry.
  • In walking in formation, stay in the middle or the front to avoid those that stumble and the beatings that follow.
  • Offer free psychiatric counseling to guards in need of it.

The key term in this description is sadistic. Evil pollutes those that touch it encouraging further evil—those abused often themselves become abusers.

This cycle of evil is not an urban legend. Stanfard (2008, 204) reports that: “Approximately 70 percent of borderline personality disorder (BPD) patients report that they were sexuality abused as a child.” The male BPD patients are the classic wife beaters, while the female BDP patients specialize in emotional abuse. In either form, spouses of BPD patients are at a high risk of suicide.

Besetting Sin

Besetting sin—chronic sin—begins to capture the true nature of evil. Evil begins to reveal itself when sin becomes part of our identity. The evil person cannot help themselves because we all live out our identities. When evil becomes institutionalized, some people practice it openly while others advert their eyes. Denying the reality of evil is on par with denying the Holocaust.

In the context of institutionalized evil, many people avoid making decisions hoping that they can escape accountability for their actions. Hannah Arendt was a student of Martin Heidegger and German Jew who, having escaped Nazi death camps before coming to America, was asked to cover the Adolf Eichmann trial in Jerusalem (1961) for the New Yorker magazine. Eichmann was the German officer who organized Adolf Hitler’s program of extermination of the Jews known as the Final Solution.

Arendt attended the trial, expecting to see a hateful, anti-Semite, only to discover that Eichmann appeared as more of a petty bureaucrat. The face of evil at the Eichmann trial was that of someone unable or unwilling to think for themselves (Arendt 1992, 97–101).Blamires (2005, 27) observed: “Eichmann is the archetype of our age, the supreme Organization Man. He kept the system going.” The discovery of interviews that Eichmann gave before he was captured that suggested Arendt had been duped, another aspect of the truly evil (Rosenthal 2011).

Satan in the Bible

Satan’s role in tempting us and promoting evil in the world is found throughout scripture. In the Garden of Eden, Satan is pictured as a snake who rebels against God and tempts others to sin by rebelling with him (Kline 2006, 302). God later advises Cain to be good because, otherwise, sin will strike like a snake crouching at your door (Gen 4:7).

Another important image of Satan is given in Job 1, where Satan is depicted as a ruthless prosecuting attorney in God’s court. Satan’s cruel lies slandered righteous Job. Still, Satan cannot afflict Job without first seeking God’s permission (Job 1:6-12). In spite of Satan’s cruelty, Job remains faithful. In the end, God not only acquits him of all of Satan’s charges, Job is rewarded for his faithful perseverance (Job 42:10).

In the synoptic gospels, the Holy Spirit leads Jesus into the desert where the devil tempts him (e.g. Luke 4:1-13). Much like Adam and Eve are tempted with food, the devil starts by trying to goad a hungry Jesus to turn a stone into bread. The devil tempts Jesus three times. Jesus cites scripture in response to each temptation. In the final temptation, the Devil’s temptation starts by misquoting scripture, but Jesus corrects the deception and resists the temptation (Nouwen 2002, 7–8).

Unlike Adam, Jesus remains faithful to God’s will in life and in death. Jesus’ death on the cross then fulfills the prophecy of Satan’s defeat (Gen 3:15) and pays the penalty for sin, so that we have been redeemed (Rom 5:12-14). Because the curse of sin is broken, the death penalty for sin has been rescinded (1 Cor 15:22). The resurrection, accordingly, proves that we have been reconciled with God.

In the Lord’s Prayer, Jesus asks us to pray that we not be tempted and that we be delivered from evil. Because Satan must ask permission to tempt us, God can deny that petition and our deliverance is within his power. King David writes: “Preserve me, O God, for in you I take refuge.” (Ps 16:1) Jesus has promised us that when we turn to him in weakness our salvation is secure (John 10:29).

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1992. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. 1995. The Cost of Discipleship (Orig Pub 1937). New York: Simon and Schuster.

Arendt, Hannah. 1996. The Life of the Mind: The Groundbreaking Investigation of How We Think. New York: Harvest Book.

Blamires, Harry. 2005. The Christian Mind: How Should a Christian Think? (Orig Pub 1963) Vancouver: Regent College Publishing.

Foley, Michael P. [editor] 2006. Augustine Confessions (Orig Pub 397 AD). 2nd Edition. Translated by F. J. Sheed (1942). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.

Frankl, Viktor E. . 2008. Man’s Search for Meaning: A Classic Tribute to Hope from the Holocaust (Orig Pub 1946). Translated by Ilse Lasch. London: Rider.

Kline, Meredith G. 2006. Kingdom Prologue: Genesis Foundations for a Covenantal Worldview. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers.

Nouwen, Henri J. M. 2002. In the Name of Jesus: Reflections on Christian Leadership. New York: Crossroad Publishing Company.

Rosenthal, Alan. 2011. “Eichmann Revisited.” The Jerusalem Post. April 20. Online: https://www.jpost.com/Jerusalem-Report/Jewish-World/Eichmann-Revisited. Accessed: December 3, 2018.

Schmemann, Alexander. 1973. For the Life of the World: Sacraments and Orthodoxy. Crestwood: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.

Smith, James K. A. 2016. You Are What You Love: The Spiritual Power of Habit. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press.

Stanford, Matthew S. 2008. Grace for the Afflicted: Viewing Mental Illness Through the Eyes of Faith. Colorado Springs: Paternoster.

Warren, Rick. 2002. The Purpose Driven Life: What on Earth am I Here For? Grand Rapids: Zondervan.

White, James Emery. 2004. Serious Times: Making Your Life Matter in an Urgent Day. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.

Sin and Evil

Also see:

The Who Question

Preface to a Life in Tension

Other ways to engage online:

Author site: http://www.StephenWHiemstra.net

Publisher site: http://www.T2Pneuma.com

Newsletter: https://bit.ly/East_2022, Signup

 

Continue Reading

Marcuse Interprets Freud

Marcuse_review_20220209

Herbert Marcuse. 1974. Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud (Orig Pub 1955). Boston: Beacon Press.

Review by Stephen W. Hiemstra

Since the Enlightenment of the nineteenth century, the two most prominent slanderers of God have been Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. Marx called faith the opioid of the masse; Freud called faith an illusion (McGrath 2004, 62-71). The work of these two pillars of atheism comes together in Herbert Marcuse’s Eros and Civilization.

The cult status of this book among prominent student radicals in the 1960s, like the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), makes the book a necessary reading for those trying to understand cultural changes that have occurred since then.[1]

Introduction

In his introduction, Marcuse (7) writes: “The purpose of this essay is to contribute to the philosophy of psychoanalysis—not psychoanalysis itself.” The word, Eros, comes from Greek and it is commonly translated as erotic love. Marcuse focuses on interpreting Freud’s views on metapsychology, by which he means cultural psychology, writing to an academic audience. His particular interest is in the relationship between the id and ego (sex and conscience) as they interact and reinforce culture.

This work, like Freud’s, builds on a mythical interpretation of history and offers virtually no empirical evidence in support of assumptions and analytical speculations. This point is important because of the sweeping influence that it has had on personal lives and culture.

The ideas for this book stemmed from lectures given in 1950-51 at the Washington School of Psychiatry.

 Background and Organization

 Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979) studied at Humboldt University in Berlin and received his doctorate at Freiburg. During the Second World War he worked the U.S. Office of Strategic Services (later, Central Intelligence Agency). His leftist credentials stem both from his writing and association with Frankfurt School of critical theory, now known as The New School for Social Research in New York.[2] The Frankfurt School is the focal point of criticism described as cultural Marxism.[3]

 Marcuse writes in eleven chapters:

  1. The Hidden Trend in Psychoanalysis
  2. The Origin of the Repressed Individual (Ontogenesis)
  3. The Origin of Repressive Civilization (Phylogenesis)
  4. The Dialect of Civilization
  5. Philosophical Interlude
  6. The Historical Limits of the Established Reality Principle
  7. Phantasy and Utopia
  8. The Images of Orpheus and Narcissus
  9. The Aesthetic Dimension
  10. The Transformation of Sexuality into Eros
  11. Eros and Thanatos (ix-x)

These chapters are proceeded by prefaces (1955 and 1966) and an introduction. They are followed by an epilogue and index. Marcuse writes about the notorious implications of his work openly in his 1966 preface.

The Freudian Model

Mancuse starts by presenting and augmenting the Freudian model of the family and civilization (culture). He writes: ”According to Freud, the history of man is the history of his repression…The uncontrolled Eros is just as fatal as his deadly counterpart, the death instinct.” (11) He continues: “The reality principle supersedes the pleasure principle: man learns to give up momentary, uncertain, and destructive pleasure for delayed, restrained, but ‘assured’ pleasure.” (13) Here pleasure is defined primarily in terms of sexual urges and death presents itself in the need to spend almost every waking hour at work to earn a living. Delayed sexual activities constitute repression and freedom is an absence of repression.

Mancuse (15) uses these definitions then to develop his cultural framework with a mythical story:

“The rule of the primal father is followed, after the first rebellion, by the rule of the sons, and the brother clan develops into institutionalized social and political domination.”

The family is accordingly the source of repression, which, in turn, becomes an agent of domination. He then goes onto posit: “Domination differs from rational exercise of authority.” (36) At this point, he is able to outline a new utopia where as civilization advances productivity, repressive and dominating relationships can be minimized and individual freedom abounds (147).

A Perspective

The model that Mancuse frames based on Freud is static and he offers no empirical evidence to support it.

Presumably the reader pictures themselves as a frustrated son in a family dominated by a father who maintains a monopoly on sexual relations and obligates the son to work, perhaps a younger Sigmund Freud. The model appears static because we are not told how the father became productive enough to start the family or how the son will be educated to take his place. The focus is on the engine of repression within the family and how this evolves into a pattern of further domination. We see no education component, no technological growth to fuel the coming utopia, and no competition to force other families to adopt similar patterns.

In graduate school in the early 1980s, I had a colleague from Siberia who his ex-pat friends referred to as Uri the spy. Like any good intelligence officer during that period, Uri spent his days reading newspapers and his evenings hosting vodka parties. I was visiting beef packing plants for my dissertation work (Hiemstra 1985) so I asked Uri to describe modern packing plants in the USSR. He proceeded to describe the same slaughtering technology in Russia that Upton Sinclair (1980) pictured in 1906 in the United States. In effect, the absence of reinvestment in the USSR left their basic infrastructure what it was before the Russian Revolution, consistent with a static Marxian worldview. The Marxian proclivity to focus on distributing the surplus rather than keeping up with the completion later led to the collapse of Russian communism.

In the Mancuse model, the static nature of the model is likely to encourage adherents to adopt a less disciplined lifestyle with the consequence of a declining commitment to family life and a lower standard of living, as we now see for many people in Western countries.

Assessment

Herbert Marcuse’s Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud is an academic book. A typical reader might not be able to follow his critique of philosophy writers, like Kant, Schiller, Marx, Hegel, Nietzsche, and Freud or be able to read his frequent quotes in untranslated German, French, and Greek. I have studied all three languages and previously read some of the philosophy literature and related critiques, but I frankly could not always follow his arguments. I recommend this book primarily to researchers interested in understanding the sexual revolution since the 1960s.

 References

Hiemstra, Stephen W. 1985. Labor Relations, Technological and Structural Change in U.S. Beef Packing and Retailing. Dissertation. Michigan State University.

McGrath, Alister. 2004. The Twilight of Atheism: The Rise and Fall of Disbelief in the Modern World. New York: DoubleDay.

Sinclair, Upton. 1980. The Jungle (Orig Pub 1906). New York: New American Library.

Footnotes

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Marcuse.

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School. https://www.NewSchool.edu.

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory.

Marcuse Interprets Freud

Also see:

Books, Films, and Ministry

Other ways to engage online:

Author site: http://www.StephenWHiemstra.net

Publisher site: http://www.T2Pneuma.com

 

Continue Reading
1 2 3 317