Review by Stephen W. Hiemstra
Toxic waste is a term once used in Washington to describe issues that could not be openly discussed without tainting the person discussing them. High on the list of such issues were race, gender, and sexuality. Hopefully, it is now possible to engage in reasoned conversation about these issues. William Webb’s book Slaves, Women and Homosexuals: Exploring the Hermaneutics of Cultural Analysis clearly attempts to begin that conversation.
Webb begins with a question and an answer. The question is: So how does a Christian respond to cultural change? His answer is: It is necessary for Christians to challenge their culture where it departs from kingdom values; it is equally necessary for them to identify with their culture on all other matters (22). The tough part arises in distinguishing: between kingdom values and cultural values within the biblical text (23). This is what Webb sees as the interpretative (hermaneutical) task.
Webb applies his hermaneutical framework primarily to 3 issues: slavery, women, and homosexuality. He picks slavery because he believes the issue to be settled within today’s church. Clearly, the role of women and the issue of homosexuality are under active conversation—at least across denominations and, in some cases, within denominations.
Webb (26-28) defines these 4 positions as held on the role of women within the church:
- Hard/strong patriarchy—unilateral submission of women with an extensive power differential;
- Soft patriarchy—unilateral submission of women with a moderate power differential;
- Evangelical egalitarianism—mutual submission with equality of power between male and female; and
- Secular egalitarianism—equal rights and no gender-defined roles.
Webb (28) likewise defines 3 positions within the church on issue of homosexuality:
- Marital heterosexuality only—homosexuality is not an acceptable lifestyle for Christians;
- Covenant and equal-partner homosexuality—homosexuality is an acceptable lifestyle for Christians provided that the partners are equal-status, consenting adults, and the relationship is one of a monogamous, covenant, and lasting kind; and
- Casual adult homosexuality—homosexuality is an appropriate lifestyle for any member of society provided it involves consenting adults.
In laying out these positions, Webb is simply defining the field of inquiry. He is not at least initially advocating for any one of these positions. Near the end of the text, however, he identifies himself as an evangelical egalitarian on women’s issues and argues for a marital hetersexuality only position with respect to homosexuality.
An important contribution of Webb’s work is a concept that he calls as a redemptive-movement hermaneutic. In defining this concept, he outlines a model: X=>Y=>Z. The X stands for the original culture; the Y stands for scripture; and the Z stands for the ultimate ethic (30-33). This model permits us to ask 2 important questions. First, does scripture move beyond the cultures of surrounding nations in addressing an issue? (X=>Y) Second, does scripture point to an ethic beyond that actually embodied in scripture? (Y=>Z) These 2 questions allow us to isolate the redemptive movement implied in the text of scripture. Webb uses this model to examine several scriptural passages that today sound bizarre, but which would have been at least slightly redemptive to the original audience. One example was the taking of female prisoners as spoils of war:
“When you go out to war against your enemies, and the LORD your God gives them into your hand and you take them captive, and you see among the captives a beautiful woman, and you desire to take her to be your wife, and you bring her home to your house, she shall shave her head and pare her nails. And she shall take off the clothes in which she was captured and shall remain in your house and lament her father and her mother a full month. After that you may go in to her and be her husband, and she shall be your wife. But if you no longer delight in her, you shall let her go where she wants. But you shall not sell her for money, nor shall you treat her as a slave, since you have humiliated her.
(Deuteronomy 21:10-14 ESV)
Webb (32-33) argues that this is clearly an ugly text in today’s culture , but in relation to the customs of ancient times was redemptive in its application under the X=>Y criteria.
Today’s application of the text would not follow the exact words prescribed in the text, but rather to observe the redemptive spirit of the text and draft an appropriately redemptive, modern policy dealing with female captives (33). Webb describes an attempt to apply the exact words of the scriptural text in a new context as a “static” interpretation (36-38). Ignoring the redemptive spirit of the text leads to wooden or misleading interpretations and may lead to the text being discredited in the eyes of believers and non-believers alike. Clearly, much more could be said about this redemptive-movement hermaneutic.
Webb writes his book in 8 chapters preceded by a foreword, acknowledgments, and an introduction and followed by a conclusion, 4 appendices, a bibliography, and a scriptural index. The chapters are:
- Christian and Culture;
- A Redemptive-Movement Hermaneutic;
- Cultural/Transcultural Analysis: A Road Map;
- Persuative Criteria;
- Moderately Persuasive Criteria;
- Inconclusive Criteria;
- Persuasive Extracriptural Criteria;
- What If I Am Wrong; and
- Conclusion: Arriving at a Bottom Line.
The foreword is written by Darrell L. Bock of the Dallas Theological Seminary .
Webb’s Slaves, Women and Homosexuals is a readable and engaging text that focuses on applying scripture rather than simply arguing over it. It is gutsy for a writer to take on the ugly texts of scripture and to find both redemption and application in them. Personally, my initial response was to reject cultural analysis because it lies outside the twin authorities of scripture and God’s direct revelation. However, I realized that I was guilty myself of discounting or skipping over the difficult texts rather than engaging them. In effect, I was already doing cultural analysis, just not employing a consistent method. This internal struggle led me to reconsider Webb’s analysis.
I am sure that some readers will simply not be able to engage in conversation about politically incorrect topics, but I would challenge them to stretch their own views a bit for the sake of understanding scripture better. Webb’s own words are helpful when he says: I must thank our modern culture for raising the issues addressed in this book. But our cultural only raises the issues…it does not resolve them (245).
 This exact issue was in the news this past week in the Middle East war in Iraq as ISIS fighters rounded up women hostages to the horror of the onlooking world.